Test results!!!

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:34am
madjax's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2006 - 09:00

Hi there... Can anyone tell me what a high blood test result is?? My DS is PA and had a blood test done...they told me that normal os 0.34 and he tested 21...Duhhhh but what does that mean??
Thanks so much!!

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 1:16pm
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Welcome!
I think the reason that you aren't getting much response is that without knowing a bit more about what kind of "blood test" this was, it is impossible to say what it might mean.
I think this probably (given the lower number you were quoted) is an ImmunoCAP RAST result. This test measures the amount of allergen-specific IgE (that is, the immune modulator that can bind a particular allergenic protein) within a blood sample. This test has a normal linear range of 0 to 100 kU/l of blood. Anything over 100 is out of the linear range of the test.
What it "means" is a horse of another color, however. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
But it means NOTHING about how sensitive the person is (ie-- do they have to actually EAT pn to have a rxn, will they have an asthma attack in a room with someone eating pb, etc.) OR how severe the next reaction will be. People with RAST numbers of 0.00 have had anaphylactic reactions requiring hospitalization.
Prior reactions being mild are [i]no assurance[/i] that the next one will be similar.
So most of us here feel that "allergic is allergic."
Does this answer some of your questions?
ETA: Just to give you some way to compare, my daughter's initial RAST at 11 mo (after a near fatal anaphylaxis episode) was about 20 as well. It has since spiked up to over 100 where it has stayed for many years, evidently regardless of how little exposure she has. She is unfortunately also very sensitive to touch and inhalation, which gradually became evident about two years after her initial diagnosis.
[This message has been edited by Corvallis Mom (edited September 13, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:12pm
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

I thought is someone had a rast of 0.00 that they were no longer allergic???

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 12:54am
LisaM's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/04/2005 - 09:00

Not necessarily---from what I've heard allergists will recommend an oral challenge to confirm that the child has grown out of the allergy. It is possible to have a negative RAST and to have an allergy. It is also possible to have a positive RAST and not to have a reaction . . . for this reason, a lot of doctors view the skin prick tests as more reliable and use the RAST for a confirmation if the diagnosis is questionable. (Although the spt isn't necessarily 100% reliable either. An allergist once told me not to eat foods to which I had a negative skin prick test which I have never had before (we were talking seafood here--I have a positive spt to some shellfish and some fish) . . . if I wanted to try them, I'd have to do so in his office.

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 2:24am
3xy1PAinNH's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/07/2006 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Corvallis Mom:
[b]
The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
][/b]
I was just researching this, and I believe the 95% predictive value is actually 15, not 5.
Having said that...Corvallis mom...I must tell you, you do an excellent job of getting out exactly the right details and explaining it in an excellent manner. I have learned well from you in just a couple of weeks! Thanks for the great explanation!

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 4:58am
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Thanks for the correct info!!
(In any case, 21 kU/l is over that too!)
[img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 1:16pm
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Welcome!
I think the reason that you aren't getting much response is that without knowing a bit more about what kind of "blood test" this was, it is impossible to say what it might mean.
I think this probably (given the lower number you were quoted) is an ImmunoCAP RAST result. This test measures the amount of allergen-specific IgE (that is, the immune modulator that can bind a particular allergenic protein) within a blood sample. This test has a normal linear range of 0 to 100 kU/l of blood. Anything over 100 is out of the linear range of the test.
What it "means" is a horse of another color, however. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
But it means NOTHING about how sensitive the person is (ie-- do they have to actually EAT pn to have a rxn, will they have an asthma attack in a room with someone eating pb, etc.) OR how severe the next reaction will be. People with RAST numbers of 0.00 have had anaphylactic reactions requiring hospitalization.
Prior reactions being mild are [i]no assurance[/i] that the next one will be similar.
So most of us here feel that "allergic is allergic."
Does this answer some of your questions?
ETA: Just to give you some way to compare, my daughter's initial RAST at 11 mo (after a near fatal anaphylaxis episode) was about 20 as well. It has since spiked up to over 100 where it has stayed for many years, evidently regardless of how little exposure she has. She is unfortunately also very sensitive to touch and inhalation, which gradually became evident about two years after her initial diagnosis.
[This message has been edited by Corvallis Mom (edited September 13, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:12pm
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

I thought is someone had a rast of 0.00 that they were no longer allergic???

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 12:54am
LisaM's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/04/2005 - 09:00

Not necessarily---from what I've heard allergists will recommend an oral challenge to confirm that the child has grown out of the allergy. It is possible to have a negative RAST and to have an allergy. It is also possible to have a positive RAST and not to have a reaction . . . for this reason, a lot of doctors view the skin prick tests as more reliable and use the RAST for a confirmation if the diagnosis is questionable. (Although the spt isn't necessarily 100% reliable either. An allergist once told me not to eat foods to which I had a negative skin prick test which I have never had before (we were talking seafood here--I have a positive spt to some shellfish and some fish) . . . if I wanted to try them, I'd have to do so in his office.

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 2:24am
3xy1PAinNH's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/07/2006 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Corvallis Mom:
[b]
The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
][/b]
I was just researching this, and I believe the 95% predictive value is actually 15, not 5.
Having said that...Corvallis mom...I must tell you, you do an excellent job of getting out exactly the right details and explaining it in an excellent manner. I have learned well from you in just a couple of weeks! Thanks for the great explanation!

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 4:58am
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Thanks for the correct info!!
(In any case, 21 kU/l is over that too!)
[img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

More Community Posts

Peanut Free and Nut Free Community

create a new community post
Displaying 1 - 20 of 20
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/21/2019 - 10:37am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/21/2019 - 10:31am
Comments: 172
Latest Post by absfabs Tue, 11/19/2019 - 11:01am
Comments: 478
Latest Post by absfabs Tue, 11/19/2019 - 10:51am
Comments: 3
Latest Post by william robenstein Mon, 11/18/2019 - 10:35am
Comments: 1
Latest Post by sunshinestate Sun, 11/17/2019 - 1:16pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by absfabs Fri, 11/15/2019 - 5:32pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by Italia38 Tue, 11/12/2019 - 2:43pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by absfabs Mon, 11/11/2019 - 1:23pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by Italia38 Fri, 11/08/2019 - 12:10pm
Comments: 4
Latest Post by Italia38 Fri, 11/08/2019 - 11:47am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/07/2019 - 3:43pm
Comments: 4
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/07/2019 - 2:48pm
Comments: 7

More Articles

It’s the time of year when holiday parties, and family gatherings can make allergen avoidance more problematic. Whether you celebrate Christmas,...

When love is in the air we can get caught up in the moment and throw caution to the wind. However, if you have a...

Food allergies and sensitivities are on the rise. Almost everyone knows someone who has problems with at least one food. The most common food...

Peanuts and Nuts Can Trigger An Asthma Attack

According to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAI), more than 3...

The relationship between anxiety and food or other allergy is a complicated and puzzling one. Research has shown that stress can exacerbate...

More Articles

More Articles

According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, over 50 million people in the U.S. have allergies. Today's allergy tests...

The Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA) addresses the labeling of packaged food products regulated by the FDA....

For people who suffer from anaphylaxis, a severe allergic reaction that can result from an allergy to...

Anaphylactic shock (A-nuh-fih-LAK-tik shok): A severe and sometimes life-threatening immune system reaction to an antigen that a person has been...

In 1963 the American Medical Association designed a special symbol that would alert emergency medical personnel of special medical conditions when...

Finding allergy-free foods for an office potluck may seem impossible, but more options are available than you might think. Eating foods prepared...

One of the most difficult things for a parent to do is determine whether his or her toddler has a cold or a...

You no doubt have your own way of teaching people about your child’s food allergy, a way that suits your temperament, and style of communication....

Reliable peanut allergy statistics are not that easy to come by. There is a lot of available research on food allergies in general but not too...

Most people know that to enjoy whatever food safety accommodations an airline offers they need to inform the airline of their allergy prior to...

A 504 plan* documents food allergy accommodations agreed to by parents and their child’s school. Plans are typically created during a 504 meeting...

If there is a child at your children's school allergic to peanuts, the school probably discourages or may not allow peanut products to be brought...

If you are on a budget, but you need to wear some sort of notification that you have a peanut...

Unless we consciously carve out time for self-care, constant food allergy management can slowly erode our sense of well-being. Signs of allergy-...

Peanuts cause more severe food allergic reactions than other foods, followed by shellfish, fish, tree nuts and eggs. Although there is only a...