Test results!!!

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:34am
madjax's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/13/2006 - 09:00

Hi there... Can anyone tell me what a high blood test result is?? My DS is PA and had a blood test done...they told me that normal os 0.34 and he tested 21...Duhhhh but what does that mean??
Thanks so much!!

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 1:16pm
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Welcome!
I think the reason that you aren't getting much response is that without knowing a bit more about what kind of "blood test" this was, it is impossible to say what it might mean.
I think this probably (given the lower number you were quoted) is an ImmunoCAP RAST result. This test measures the amount of allergen-specific IgE (that is, the immune modulator that can bind a particular allergenic protein) within a blood sample. This test has a normal linear range of 0 to 100 kU/l of blood. Anything over 100 is out of the linear range of the test.
What it "means" is a horse of another color, however. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
But it means NOTHING about how sensitive the person is (ie-- do they have to actually EAT pn to have a rxn, will they have an asthma attack in a room with someone eating pb, etc.) OR how severe the next reaction will be. People with RAST numbers of 0.00 have had anaphylactic reactions requiring hospitalization.
Prior reactions being mild are [i]no assurance[/i] that the next one will be similar.
So most of us here feel that "allergic is allergic."
Does this answer some of your questions?
ETA: Just to give you some way to compare, my daughter's initial RAST at 11 mo (after a near fatal anaphylaxis episode) was about 20 as well. It has since spiked up to over 100 where it has stayed for many years, evidently regardless of how little exposure she has. She is unfortunately also very sensitive to touch and inhalation, which gradually became evident about two years after her initial diagnosis.
[This message has been edited by Corvallis Mom (edited September 13, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:12pm
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

I thought is someone had a rast of 0.00 that they were no longer allergic???

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 12:54am
LisaM's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/04/2005 - 09:00

Not necessarily---from what I've heard allergists will recommend an oral challenge to confirm that the child has grown out of the allergy. It is possible to have a negative RAST and to have an allergy. It is also possible to have a positive RAST and not to have a reaction . . . for this reason, a lot of doctors view the skin prick tests as more reliable and use the RAST for a confirmation if the diagnosis is questionable. (Although the spt isn't necessarily 100% reliable either. An allergist once told me not to eat foods to which I had a negative skin prick test which I have never had before (we were talking seafood here--I have a positive spt to some shellfish and some fish) . . . if I wanted to try them, I'd have to do so in his office.

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 2:24am
3xy1PAinNH's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/07/2006 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Corvallis Mom:
[b]
The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
][/b]
I was just researching this, and I believe the 95% predictive value is actually 15, not 5.
Having said that...Corvallis mom...I must tell you, you do an excellent job of getting out exactly the right details and explaining it in an excellent manner. I have learned well from you in just a couple of weeks! Thanks for the great explanation!

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 4:58am
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Thanks for the correct info!!
(In any case, 21 kU/l is over that too!)
[img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 1:16pm
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Welcome!
I think the reason that you aren't getting much response is that without knowing a bit more about what kind of "blood test" this was, it is impossible to say what it might mean.
I think this probably (given the lower number you were quoted) is an ImmunoCAP RAST result. This test measures the amount of allergen-specific IgE (that is, the immune modulator that can bind a particular allergenic protein) within a blood sample. This test has a normal linear range of 0 to 100 kU/l of blood. Anything over 100 is out of the linear range of the test.
What it "means" is a horse of another color, however. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
But it means NOTHING about how sensitive the person is (ie-- do they have to actually EAT pn to have a rxn, will they have an asthma attack in a room with someone eating pb, etc.) OR how severe the next reaction will be. People with RAST numbers of 0.00 have had anaphylactic reactions requiring hospitalization.
Prior reactions being mild are [i]no assurance[/i] that the next one will be similar.
So most of us here feel that "allergic is allergic."
Does this answer some of your questions?
ETA: Just to give you some way to compare, my daughter's initial RAST at 11 mo (after a near fatal anaphylaxis episode) was about 20 as well. It has since spiked up to over 100 where it has stayed for many years, evidently regardless of how little exposure she has. She is unfortunately also very sensitive to touch and inhalation, which gradually became evident about two years after her initial diagnosis.
[This message has been edited by Corvallis Mom (edited September 13, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 09/13/2006 - 11:12pm
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

I thought is someone had a rast of 0.00 that they were no longer allergic???

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 12:54am
LisaM's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/04/2005 - 09:00

Not necessarily---from what I've heard allergists will recommend an oral challenge to confirm that the child has grown out of the allergy. It is possible to have a negative RAST and to have an allergy. It is also possible to have a positive RAST and not to have a reaction . . . for this reason, a lot of doctors view the skin prick tests as more reliable and use the RAST for a confirmation if the diagnosis is questionable. (Although the spt isn't necessarily 100% reliable either. An allergist once told me not to eat foods to which I had a negative skin prick test which I have never had before (we were talking seafood here--I have a positive spt to some shellfish and some fish) . . . if I wanted to try them, I'd have to do so in his office.

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 2:24am
3xy1PAinNH's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/07/2006 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Corvallis Mom:
[b]
The higher the number, the more likely a person is to be "clinically allergic" to that substance. At some point, the number is pretty much 100% predictive of a "real" allergy. For peanut, you are almost certainly past it. In my recollection, that 95% predictive value is less than 5...
][/b]
I was just researching this, and I believe the 95% predictive value is actually 15, not 5.
Having said that...Corvallis mom...I must tell you, you do an excellent job of getting out exactly the right details and explaining it in an excellent manner. I have learned well from you in just a couple of weeks! Thanks for the great explanation!

Posted on: Thu, 09/14/2006 - 4:58am
Corvallis Mom's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

Thanks for the correct info!!
(In any case, 21 kU/l is over that too!)
[img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

More Community Posts

Peanut Free and Nut Free Community

create a new community post
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/14/2019 - 12:56pm
Comments: 0
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/14/2019 - 12:52pm
Comments: 1
Latest Post by Italia38 Tue, 10/08/2019 - 12:19pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by Italia38 Tue, 10/08/2019 - 12:18pm
Comments: 1
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/07/2019 - 7:19pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/07/2019 - 7:16pm
Comments: 10
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/07/2019 - 7:13pm
Comments: 13
Latest Post by penelope Mon, 10/07/2019 - 7:10pm
Comments: 9
Latest Post by mom2two Mon, 09/16/2019 - 1:03pm
Comments: 18
Latest Post by desmond Mon, 09/16/2019 - 1:00pm
Comments: 1
Latest Post by desmond Mon, 09/16/2019 - 12:58pm
Comments: 19
Latest Post by TeddyCan Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:32pm
Comments: 10
Latest Post by DTurner Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:31pm
Comments: 5
Latest Post by B.M.18 Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:30pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by abolitionist146 Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:28pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by nutfreenyc Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:19pm
Comments: 4
Latest Post by AllergicTeen2 Mon, 09/09/2019 - 4:18pm
Comments: 2

More Articles

You might have wondered if small amounts of an ingredient can be added to a food product without being declared on the food’s label. The FDA...

Is it possible to eat your way to a food allergy cure? Scientists think it’s...

There are many reasons why you may want to substitute almond flour for wheat flour in recipes. Of course, if you have a...

Not all oils are created equal. Some oils are high in saturated fats or in trans-fatty acids – not good for general health. Some are partially...

It may never be safe to begin feeding peanut butter to your baby or toddler if you have peanut allergies in your family. If either parent or one...

More Articles

More Articles

What is a peanut allergy? It is a reaction that occurs in the body after eating peanuts or peanut...

For those with severe food allergies, flying can be a stressful process. Here are...

Approximately one out of 13 children under age 18 are allergic to at least one food, though many of them will outgrow their allergy by the age of...

Fact 1: Over a third of food allergy reactions happen after the first known oral...

The reason why some people are affected by allergies while others are not begins in their genes. Allergies are passed down from generation to...

Here’s a tip that might someday save your life, or that of a loved one: two to four times a year, review the proper way to use your epinephrine...

Lactose intolerance is the inability to process lactose, a sugar found in milk, caused by the lack of a needed enzyme. Those with lactose...

Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA)

An important part of peanut allergy awareness was enacted on January 1, 2006...

Tomato allergies are very rare. They are a "type 1 allergy," which means a contact allergy. When a person with this type of allergy touches a...

Milk allergies are becoming more common, especially in babies and small children. There is some confusion about what is an allergic reaction and...

Recognizing food allergy in babies or toddlers is not always easy, but there are specific risk factors and signs that parents and other caregivers...

Burlap bags are often used to store and ship coffee beans, potatoes, rice, seeds, nuts, and peanuts. They can be one of the disguised...

People with pollen allergies need to stay away from some foods. If you have allergic rhinitis in the spring or fall, you may not realize that you...

Of course, everyone knows that if you have a peanut allergy that you should avoid peanuts, peanut butter, peanut butter cookies and foods that...

Eating at a nut-free lunch table in school is a safety precaution that causes some students to feel isolated from their peers. Unfortunately,...