recall on Coffee Crisp

Posted on: Sat, 02/25/2006 - 1:14am
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

I just received this moments ago. Please Read:

ALLERGY ALERT - UNDECLARED PEANUT PROTEIN IN NESTLE COFFEE CRISP WAFER BAR
SOLD IN PEANUT FREE ASSORTED SNACK SIZE PACKAGES

OTTAWA, February 25, 2006 - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and
Nestle Canada Inc. are warning people with allergies to peanut protein not
to consume the Nestle Coffee Crisp Wafer Bar described below. The affected
product may contain peanut protein which is not declared on the label.

The affected product, Nestle Coffee Crisp Wafer Bar, is sold as a snack size
bar stamped with a code beginning with 5180 followed by a series of number
and letters.

These bars are known to have been sold in a 247g " Nestle Fav*rites" package
of assorted peanut free snack size bars bearing UPC 0 59800 20958 8 and best
before date 2006AL29. These individual coffee crisp bars may have also been
sold as part of other snack size bar packages. Consumers are advised to
check the individual Coffee Crisp bars to verify if they have the affected
code 5180XXXX .

The affected product has been distributed nationally. There has been one
reported reaction associated with this product.

Consumption of this product may cause a serious or life-threatening reaction
in persons with allergies to peanut protein.

Nestle Canada Inc., North York, Ontario is voluntarily recalling the
affected product from the marketplace. The CFIA is monitoring the
effectiveness of the recall.

For more information, consumers and industry can call one of the following
numbers:
Nestle Consumer Services at 1-800-387- 4636
CFIA at 1 800 442-2342 / TTY 1 800 465-7735 (8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern
time, Monday to Friday).

Sandra

Posted on: Sat, 02/25/2006 - 8:12am
Yonit's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/24/2002 - 09:00

How could this possibly have happened if they are produced in a peanut-free facility? Wow, this is very disturbing. it's hard enough to trust . . . this doesn't help.

Posted on: Sat, 02/25/2006 - 9:39am
Codyman's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2002 - 09:00

Mistakes can happen. I'm glad they are recalling the products.

Posted on: Sat, 02/25/2006 - 3:12pm
gw_mom3's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/14/2000 - 09:00

Yes, mistakes happen, but how, when the plant is *supposedly* peanut free? Unless there was an employee issue or something, there shouldn't be any peanut in the plant to "accidentally" get in there. This really bites because a friend of mine was getting us a box of nestle minis (and may already have bought/sent it). Unless there's a reasonable explanation I think my trust in Nestle Canada has gone way down and I will just get holiday candies from VNF and Kellie's.
------------------
==============
[b]~Gale~[/b]

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 1:41am
mharasym's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/20/2001 - 09:00

I'm going to hold off making any judgements on the safety of Nestle until they explain what happened. I hope (and expect) that Nestle Canada will have something posted on their site in the coming days. If they don't, that will be very telling. The recall was just issued late Friday so I don't believe they've had time to react (interesting choice of words [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img].
I'll be watching closely as we live on Nestle's treats (large & mini) in our home.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 2:31am
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

I phoned Nestle Cda. The recording said it was one isolated case. I will call back on Monday and hopefully speak to someone.
Our family has been eating Nestle products for years. I was, and still am very confident with Nestle products and will always continue to buy them. I will though refrain from buying the little coffee crisp bars until this gets cleared up and then continue to buy them also.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 10:49am
becca's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/22/2001 - 09:00

One isolated case of someone reacting to peanut in a candy they made in a peanut free facility. I would be very wary and am losing trust until further explanation.
I mean, that just means that the peanut contamination found its way into a PA person's mouth. So, I would assume there is more contamination across the product line, just not consumed by a PA individual. KWIM??
How can peanut be in a nut free facility(peanut fee)? becca

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 11:36am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Quote:Originally posted by mharasym:
[b] I hope (and expect) that Nestle Canada will have something posted on their site in the coming days. If they don't, that will be very telling.[/b]
Actually, I'm hoping they will make a public statement to the media. I don't actually expect to see it on their web-site because [i]personally[/i] I'm not at all impressed with their web-site.
I am surprised this has not been on the news AT ALL. Yes, it was one person that reacted. Yes, the person is fine. But this is Nestle - famous for being peanut free. I think we deserve an explanation.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 10:17pm
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

The product was distributed on June 29/2005 in the small assorted bags until April 29/2006. Nestle notified the Canadian Food inspection and the Allergy and Asthma Association.
I called the BT tv station and they are going to put it on the air at 8:30am this morning. He was very happy I gave him the information.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 10:36pm
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Sandy1:
[i]I just received this moments ago. Please Read:
ALLERGY ALERT - UNDECLARED PEANUT PROTEIN IN NESTLE COFFEE CRISP WAFER BAR
SOLD IN PEANUT FREE ASSORTED SNACK SIZE PACKAGES
OTTAWA, February 25, 2006 - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and
Nestle Canada Inc. are warning people with allergies to peanut protein not
to consume the Nestle Coffee Crisp Wafer Bar described below. The affected
product [b]may[/b] contain peanut protein which is not declared on the label.
[/i]
noting. does this mean that the one isolated incident was indeed a reaction to peanut protein? Have they confirmed there was even peanut protein in the item? If there was, have they confirmed the source?

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 10:37pm
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

It was just aired.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 10:50pm
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b] noting. does this mean that the one isolated incident was indeed a reaction to peanut protein? Have they confirmed there was even peanut protein in the item? If there was, have they confirmed the source?
[/b]
I am very confused. I have a friend who used to work for Nestle (she has moved on to a new company now) and she talked about the nut-free facility too.
This facility is totally peanut-free/nut-free. The employees are not even allowed to bring in nut products for lunch (ie: no peanut butter sandwiches, etc). It is strictly nut-free.
So I guess we'll just have to wait for more details from Nestle.
[This message has been edited by erik (edited February 27, 2006).]

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 11:10pm
tidina's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/26/2005 - 09:00

maybe one of the ingredients was tainted. like sugar stored in bin that had nuts in it at a previous location. who knows??? i never hear about recalls on the news. maybe its different in canada.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 11:22pm
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

I just got off the phone with Nestle. All they said was they are investigating. We will have to wait and see.

Posted on: Sun, 02/26/2006 - 11:49pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

MB - as usual you are one step ahead of me.
I'm wondering if they made the recall without actually having any product test positive. I sincerely believe Nestle takes the labelling of their products very seriously. A reaction was reported. But what is the protocol for a recall? Would they recall even before anything tested positive? It's possible.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 12:07am
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Yes, Nestle may just be investigating at the moment. The recall may just be "as a precaution" until they have completed the investigation. Perhaps someone reported a reaction. But is it definitely a "peanut reaction"? Maybe it was a reaction to something else (milk, wheat, etc) in the Coffee Crisp, or something else that they had eaten that day? I assume the investigation that is being carried out will assist in telling us what happened. They are probably just investigating the circumstances to determine all of the details, and perhaps there was no peanut contamination at all (considering it is a peanut-free facility, I find it difficult to determine how any peanut traces could even get into that facility in the first place)

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 12:32am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I don't know what BT tv is (unless you mean BreatkfastTelevision?)
tidina, recalls are not always on the news. I get them from the Canadian government and they include allergy recalls, safety recalls (e.g. car seats), and food poisoning. They only make it on the news when they affect a large portion of people. In this case, because these are labelled *Peanut Free* I think it is definitely news-worthy.
**********
Regarding the reported reaction....The mother ate the choc. bar and kissed her daughter. The daughter (pa) had a reaction. I'm still not convinced it's a peanut reaction to the Nestle choc. bar.
That's a reaction to a kiss on the cheek after a *trace amount* was eaten. (If it's to the choc. bar.)

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 1:28am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]MB - as usual you are one step ahead of me.
[/b]
awwwww, shucks. Remember, I [b]am[/b] thinking for two at the present. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 1:45am
ajgauthier's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/13/2005 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]I don't know what BT tv is (unless you mean BreatkfastTelevision?)
tidina, recalls are not always on the news. I get them from the Canadian government and they include allergy recalls, safety recalls (e.g. car seats), and food poisoning. They only make it on the news when they affect a large portion of people. In this case, because these are labelled *Peanut Free* I think it is definitely news-worthy.
**********
Regarding the reported reaction....The mother ate the choc. bar and kissed her daughter. The daughter (pa) had a reaction. I'm still not convinced it's a peanut reaction to the Nestle choc. bar.
That's a reaction to a kiss on the cheek after a *trace amount* was eaten. (If it's to the choc. bar.)[/b]
maybe her lipstick/balm had peanut oil or almond in it or something?
If the child is sensitive to latex, there is a cross-reactivity between shea oil (in Coffee Crisp) and latex.
Adrienne
------------------
30-year old survivor of severe peanut/tree nut allergy

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 4:15am
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

I don't think there is a problem with Nestle Cda either, but I am disappointed that Nestle didn't put out the recall just in case as a precautionary measure whether it was true or not.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 4:23am
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Sandy1:
[b]I don't think there is a problem with Nestle Cda either, but I am disappointed that Nestle didn't put out the recall just in case as a precautionary measure whether it was true or not. [/b]
Theer is currently a recall. Nestle is giving refunds to customers.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 4:26am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I don't understand what you mean Sandy1
quoted from the recall notice:
Quote:Nestle Canada Inc., North York, Ontario is [b]voluntarily[/b] recalling the
affected product from the marketplace.
Since there are no laws regarding labelling *may contain* I would hazard a guess that they are not legally obligated to recall. (Might be different because they say peanut free - but honestly, I don't think there are laws about that either. Can't break a non-existent law can you?)
Anyway, I think Nestle is probably as upset about this as we are.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 4:30am
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

Sorry, That didn't come out right. What I meant to say was this should have been sent to the news room so all people can be aware.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 4:49am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Sandy1:
[b]Sorry, That didn't come out right. What I meant to say was this should have been sent to the news room so all people can be aware. [/b]
are all recalls sent to the "news room"? I mean, especially the "food allergy" ones?

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 9:43am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Not all - but i agree this one should.
There is a *media release* on their web-site with a letter. (It's copied in the thread in Main about this recall.)
*********
The mother that originally reported the reaction got a phone call from the CFIA this morning. The two coffee crisp bars they picked up from her did have peanut protein. The other bars in the same box did NOT have peanut protein.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 9:44am
Douglas M's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/27/2006 - 09:00

TO NESTLE SA
As you are no doubt aware,the peanut allergic community in Canada is concerned about the revelation that certain "peant free"coffee crisp minis,nade by Nestle Canada's nut free facility,in fact were contaminated with peanut protein.Can you shed further accurate information concerning this?Your "peanut free" assurances are very appreciated by a growing segment of the Canadain peanut allergic population who have come to rely on the integrity of your peanut free production of treats favoured by allergic children their families,friends,schools,and summer camps.We all hope our concerns can be allayed,and that we can continue to trust and rely on these "nut free" treats.Thank You.
President Nut Free Safe

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 9:46am
Codyman's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by gw_mom3:
[b]Yes, mistakes happen, but how, when the plant is *supposedly* peanut free? Unless there was an employee issue or something, there shouldn't be any peanut in the plant to "accidentally" get in there. This really bites because a friend of mine was getting us a box of nestle minis (and may already have bought/sent it). Unless there's a reasonable explanation I think my trust in Nestle Canada has gone way down and I will just get holiday candies from VNF and Kellie's.
[/b]
My trust in the company hasn't changed. "I" personally will wait for an explanation and in the mean time still eat other Nestle products.

Posted on: Mon, 02/27/2006 - 12:19pm
gw_mom3's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/14/2000 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Codyman:
[b] My trust in the company hasn't changed. "I" personally will wait for an explanation and in the mean time still eat other Nestle products.[/b]
I won't take any chances with my kids. If it was *me* with the allergy, then maybe. Then again maybe not-I'd hate for something to happen to me and have to worry about who would make sure my dd only eats safe foods. Anyway if I had any recalled food from Canada I'd be SOL. It's way too long of a drive to take it back.
Until I find out how peanut protein got into candy bars made in a peanut free plant (that the company actually advertises is a peanut free plant), I'm passing on all things Nestle (Canada-I boycott Nestle USA anyway). It's not as if I can go to the store and buy it anyway-I have to arrange for someone to send it to me and luckily, my friend hadn't bought it yet.
------------------
==============
[b]~Gale~[/b]

Posted on: Mon, 03/13/2006 - 5:26am
Codyman's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2002 - 09:00

I just got off the phone with a representative from Nestle regarding their Coffee Crisp product. The representative said the peanut protein was found ON the chocolate bar NOT IN the chocolate bar. She also said that the investigation is still on going.
She told me that Nestle keeps chocolate bars from each line/batch and not just a few but MANY MANY. She said out of the 900,000 plus chocolate bars it was the only one that had peanut protein and again stressed it was ON the chocolate bar.
She told me that Nestle takes food allergies very seriously.

Posted on: Mon, 03/13/2006 - 5:45am
Sandy1's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/17/2005 - 09:00

good to hear.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:11am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Quote:Originally posted by Codyman:
[b] She said out of the 900,000 plus chocolate bars it was the only one that had peanut protein and again stressed it was ON the chocolate bar.
[/b]
What concerns me about this is that the CFIA picked up [b]two[/b] sealed bars and they [b]both[/b] tested positive.
This comment makes me feel [i]less[/i] secure with Nestle.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:20am
tidina's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/26/2005 - 09:00

how did the protein get there? someone eat peanuts or peanut butter and touch a couple and then realize he better wash up???

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:33am
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by tidina:
[b]how did the protein get there? someone eat peanuts or peanut butter and touch a couple and then realize he better wash up???[/b]
Peanuts and peanut butter are banned from this facility. Employees can not bring any peanut products into the building or in their lunches.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:37am
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b] What concerns me about this is that the CFIA picked up two sealed bars and they both tested positive.
This comment makes me feel [i]less[/i] secure with Nestle. [/b]
If it was intentional sabatoge by a disgruntled employee, it could happen at any company. Even though I may feel less secure about these Nestle products, it also means I am less secure about all food products.
Chapmans ice cream, Dare cookies, etc.. a disgruntled employee could sabotage any of these products with peanut.
I'm sure you all remember the Tylenol incident, and the threats by animal rights activists to poison Mars bars, etc...
Scary times we live in.
[This message has been edited by erik (edited March 15, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:38am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by erik:
[b] Peanuts and peanut butter are banned from this facility. Employees can not bring any peanut products into the building or in their lunches.
[/b]
how do they enforce this?

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:42am
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b] how do they enforce this?
[/b]
I'm not sure... I assume if they catch any employees bringing peanut products to work, the employee is fired? Maybe someone else at PA.COM has contacted Nestle and has more details as I have no idea how this is enforced.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 3:34am
PAmum's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/15/2006 - 09:00

Just want to let everyone knows that I have contacted numerous media including Global and CTV regarding this recall and none of them has replied nor did a story on this. I guess it's not news-worthy because there has only been one case and the victim was not dead!
I have also contacted a couple of lawyers in regards to this. And again, because the damage done was not great(my dd is still alive and well), there is no point in persuing any legal action. The cost of lawyer is much greater than the compensation.
I will not be expecting any information release by the CFIA as the information now becomes private under the law. Maybe Nestle will tell us what happen when they found the problem, maybe not.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 4:18am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Quote:Originally posted by erik:
[b] If it was intentional sabatoge by a disgruntled employee, it could happen at any company. Even though I may feel less secure about these Nestle products, it also means I am less secure about all food products.
[/b]
Erik, I completely agree with this.
My comment was in connection with what Nestle is saying NOW.
It wasn't [i]just[/i] one bar. It was the one that PAMom ate, and the two that were picked up from her home. (I'm no math wizard - but 1 + 2 = 3) So, that's 3 out of 3.
OK, thinking while I type here. Maybe what they meant was it was [i]only[/i] one batch. All other batches were safe.
********
Codyman, could it be that what she said/meant was it was the only batch containing peanut protein?
Maybe I'll explain why this is an important point to me. (Skip this part if you don't care.)
I do trust Nestle. I have continued eating Nestle products - just not any of the mini-bars. I expect that I will eventually eat them again, but just not right now.
I agree that Nestle IS taking this very seriously. I believe they take their *peanut free* symbol and status very seriously.
Very little information is coming from them about this. That IS understandable. They cannot say anything until they are sure. Will they ever discover how this happened? We all hope so - but I have to admit that it's possible they won't.
BUT, if what little information they release in inaccurate - I will have a hard time trusting them. If they say it was only [i]one[/i] bar, and I [i]know[/i] it was more then one - then I have to question what other information is inaccurate.
*******
I hope it's clear that I am NOT trying to bash Nestle.
*******
Regarding enforcing no peanut products by employees .... One plant (I don't remember what company) it was actually part of an employees job agreement, or job description. Several employees said that if they brought it into the building EVER they lose their job. No second chance. This was made clear before they were officially hired for the job.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 4:27am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]
Regarding enforcing no peanut products by employees .... One plant (I don't remember what company) it was actually part of an employees job agreement, or job description. Several employees said that if they brought it into the building EVER they lose their job. No second chance. This was made clear before they were officially hired for the job.[/b]
great. but how do they find out? is it after someone is injured? and if so, is that the kind of enforcement you want?

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 4:31am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]
My comment was in connection with what Nestle is saying NOW.
It wasn't [i]just[/i] one bar. It was the one that PAMom ate, and the two that were picked up from her home. (I'm no math wizard - but 1 + 2 = 3) So, that's 3 out of 3.
OK, thinking while I type here. Maybe what they meant was it was [i]only[/i] one batch. All other batches were safe.
********
[/b]
I'm wondering too. I mean, was it three? and did one of those three just happen to find a family with pa? or was it an entire batch? and if so, that's a whole lot if sabotage, or carelessness, or breaking factory rules is involved. and still, depending on the size of the batch and number of batches, and amount of protein, would it just happen to find a pa family? KWIM? I'd like to hear more from Nestle.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 4:58am
PAmum's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/15/2006 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by Codyman:
[b]I just got off the phone with a representative from Nestle regarding their Coffee Crisp product. The representative said the peanut protein was found ON the chocolate bar NOT IN the chocolate bar. She also said that the investigation is still on going.
[/b]
I just got off the phone with Nestle Canada. I asked specifically what was told above and the lady said she has no knowledge of that. And that no information will be released until they find exactly what happened. Investigation is still on going. Basically, she didn't tell me anything. So here, different information were given by the same company, which story do you prefer?
As for the whole thing about sabotage or not, I believe the problem was with the whole batch. What's the chance of those 3 were only landed in my house? Or maybe just my luck?

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 5:35am
Codyman's picture
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by PAmum:
[b] I just got off the phone with Nestle Canada. I asked specifically what was told above and the lady said she has no knowledge of that. And that no information will be released until they find exactly what happened. Investigation is still on going. Basically, she didn't tell me anything. So here, different information were given by the same company, which story do you prefer?
As for the whole thing about sabotage or not, I believe the problem was with the whole batch. What's the chance of those 3 were only landed in my house? Or maybe just my luck? [/b]
PAmum: Are you the "one" that had a reaction and let CFIA and Nestle know about it??
OR
Are you also username "Tracey" who had the grandmother eat a chocolate bar, give a kiss and then had a reaction and posted it here on pa.com??
Quote:Originally posted by PAmum:
[b]So here, different information were given by the same company, which story do you prefer?[/b]
I don't prefer any story, I prefer the truth. I had actually phoned Nestle regarding a different product and during the conversation mentioned my children were allergic to peanuts and nuts and wanted to know if all Coffee Crisp products in question (regarding the peanut protein) were pulled off the shelves. The CSR was very friendly and it didn't seem that she was giving me a story. She did say the investigation is still on going. When you phone Nestle there is a # to push if you want info regarding Coffee Crisp. I have yet to listen to it, as I was phoning for another reason.
Quote:Originally posted by PAmum:
[b]Just want to let everyone knows that I have contacted numerous media including Global and CTV regarding this recall and none of them has replied nor did a story on this. I guess it's not news-worthy because there has only been one case and the victim was not dead![/b]
I have seen info regarding Nestle ~ Coffee Crisp on CTV news.

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 5:50am
PAmum's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/15/2006 - 09:00

Codyman, I was the one who complained to CFIA and the recall was issued in Feb. My dd was the one who had the reaction. And no, I am not "Tracey", am yet to hear from her though.
Please don't take me wrong, I also prefer the truth. I used the word "story" only to refer to what was told. I didn't mean to be sarcastic in any way.
The CSR I spoke to today was very nice too. But she hadn't heard of where the protein was found. What she was able to tell me was exactly what was on the recording.
I can't believe I miss the news on CTV. Oh well, the important thing is that it was broadcast. But was it just regarding the recall? Did they persue further on how the coffee crisp was contaminated? I think this kind of investigation is best done by the media because of their perseverance.
[This message has been edited by PAmum (edited March 15, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 11:25am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b] great. but how do they find out? is it after someone is injured? and if so, is that the kind of enforcement you want?
[/b]
Is that different from any laws? Do you get arrested [i]before[/i] you attempt to shoot someone? or only after?

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 11:43am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b] Is that different from any laws? Do you get arrested [i]before[/i] you attempt to shoot someone? or only after?[/b]
I'm talking about quality control. Not laws. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img] I'm used to institutions that have stopgaps in place. [i]in order to prevent sentinel events.[/i]
I mean, if you have a goal, there should be precautions in place to achieve that goal. Like preventing medication errors, for example. There are 5 "r"'s of medication administration. It is something that, through many aspects, including training, education, policy, and [i]redundancy[/i], for example is implemented.
It's not enough to say: "Medication errors should not happen." or "Medication errors are not allowed." or "[i]Those who make medication errors will be fired.[/i]"
it's more about: "This is how we strive to ensure correct medication administration." [i]In order to prevent mistakes.[/i]
There are safeguards in place to ensure correct medication administration. I mean, as opposed to saying: "If you make a medication error, you will be fired."
KWIM? not saying that's the methodology Nestle uses, just asking what the methodology is. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 11:52am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

You'd have to ask Nestle for the specifics. When I go into a hospital, I don't usually ask all those specifics. I rely on them to know what they are doing - have all the safeguards in place - do everything correctly. And yes, I rely on companies that say they are peanut-free to do all that too. (It's really just an extension of all the other safe-guards a company has in place. I don't expect to find hair in my canned pasta - but I don't specifically ask the company how that prevent hair from getting in their. I'm pretty sure they don't shave all their employees heads - although honestly, I've never asked. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] )

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:00pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Quote:Originally posted by Codyman:
[b]PAmum: Are you the "one" that had a reaction and let CFIA and Nestle know about it??
OR
Are you also username "Tracey" who had the grandmother eat a chocolate bar, give a kiss and then had a reaction and posted it here on pa.com?? [/b]
Actually, PAmum is the mother of the "one" that had a reaction.
She posted about it [i]before[/i] contacting CFIA. She posted the day CFIA picked up the [b]sealed[/b] candybars. It was a little over a week after that - when CFIA sent out the allergy alert and recall notice. It was specifically the bar PAmum posted about. The mini coffee crisp bars from the Nestle Favourites box.
PAmum's daughter was recently diagnosed - and she has been posting under the same name at another board. Posting is to similar - I'm sure it is the same person.
Tracey has been at pa.com since 2001. Not sure why she has not come back into the other thread.
********
PAmum, personally, I want to thank you for reporting this to CFIA. It has resulted in my *safe little zone* shrinking, but I'd rather have my zone shrink then have a reaction that could have been prevented. I also thought it was quite cool that you chose to come to this board to give first hand answers.
*********
Edited because I didn't realize who Codyman was talking about - Tracey.
[This message has been edited by AnnaMarie (edited March 15, 2006).]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:35pm
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b] Tracey has been at pa.com since 2001. Not sure why she has not come back into the other thread.[/b]
Tracey posted about Coffee Crisp here: [url="http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/Forum1/HTML/007383.html"]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/Forum1/HTML/007383.html[/url]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 12:40pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

You saw my original post didn't you Erik. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/redface.gif[/img]
I'm starting to think I need a little *kicking self in butt* smilie. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 1:03pm
erik's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]You saw my original post didn't you Erik. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/redface.gif[/img][/b]
yes [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img] hehe have a good evening!

Posted on: Wed, 03/15/2006 - 10:32pm
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]You'd have to ask Nestle for the specifics. When I go into a hospital, I don't usually ask all those specifics. I rely on them to know what they are doing - have all the safeguards in place - do everything correctly. And yes, I rely on companies that say they are peanut-free to do all that too. (It's really just an extension of all the other safe-guards a company has in place. I don't expect to find hair in my canned pasta - but I don't specifically ask the company how that prevent hair from getting in their. I'm pretty sure they don't shave all their employees heads - although honestly, I've never asked. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img] )[/b]
So, if you were going in for major surgery, and you found out the hospital you were going to have surgery at recently removed the wrong limb of a patient, or operated on the wrong patient entirely...........would you question what *safeguards* were in place, either then, or afterwards, that would prevent that in the future?
If you chose a different hospital, would you ask *them* similiar questions? Would you find yourself, from then on, looking more closely at a whole gamut of institutions, and situations, not just hospitals. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/wink.gif[/img]
Maybe it's because I've been deeply immersed in certain pathways, that I just naturally question the how-to's when presented with goals. KWIM? Or maybe it's just me. Period.

Pages

More Community Posts

Peanut Free and Nut Free Community

create a new community post
Latest Post by Italia38 Tue, 11/12/2019 - 2:43pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by absfabs Mon, 11/11/2019 - 1:28pm
Comments: 2
Latest Post by absfabs Mon, 11/11/2019 - 1:23pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by Italia38 Fri, 11/08/2019 - 12:10pm
Comments: 4
Latest Post by Italia38 Fri, 11/08/2019 - 11:47am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/07/2019 - 3:43pm
Comments: 4
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 11/07/2019 - 2:48pm
Comments: 7
Latest Post by penelope Tue, 11/05/2019 - 3:44pm
Comments: 12
Latest Post by penelope Tue, 11/05/2019 - 3:35pm
Comments: 13
Latest Post by absfabs Tue, 11/05/2019 - 2:11pm
Comments: 6
Latest Post by absfabs Tue, 11/05/2019 - 2:09pm
Comments: 5
Latest Post by chicken Tue, 11/05/2019 - 12:06pm
Comments: 5
Latest Post by sunshinestate Mon, 11/04/2019 - 1:44pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by sunshinestate Thu, 10/31/2019 - 11:20am
Comments: 2

More Articles

For people who suffer from anaphylaxis, a severe allergic reaction that can result from an allergy to...

Anaphylactic shock (A-nuh-fih-LAK-tik shok): A severe and sometimes life-threatening immune system reaction to an antigen that a person has been...

In 1963 the American Medical Association designed a special symbol that would alert emergency medical personnel of special medical conditions when...

Finding allergy-free foods for an office potluck may seem impossible, but more options are available than you might think. Eating foods prepared...

One of the most difficult things for a parent to do is determine whether his or her toddler has a cold or a...

More Articles

More Articles

You no doubt have your own way of teaching people about your child’s food allergy, a way that suits your temperament, and style of communication....

Reliable peanut allergy statistics are not that easy to come by. There is a lot of available research on food allergies in general but not too...

Most people know that to enjoy whatever food safety accommodations an airline offers they need to inform the airline of their allergy prior to...

A 504 plan* documents food allergy accommodations agreed to by parents and their child’s school. Plans are typically created during a 504 meeting...

If there is a child at your children's school allergic to peanuts, the school probably discourages or may not allow peanut products to be brought...

If you are on a budget, but you need to wear some sort of notification that you have a peanut...

Unless we consciously carve out time for self-care, constant food allergy management can slowly erode our sense of well-being. Signs of allergy-...

Peanuts cause more severe food allergic reactions than other foods, followed by shellfish, fish, tree nuts and eggs. Although there is only a...

If you avoid peanuts, it’s likely you know the joy of cashews. Slightly sweet and smooth in texture, cashews provide not only relief to those with...

The prevalence of food allergy has dramatically increased over the past two to three decades, and not just among children. Preliminary results...

When someone in the family is diagnosed with a food allergy, a choice must be made whether to ban the problem food or foods from the home. The...

Looking for a fun way to share what you know about your own food allergies? Or are you hoping to educate the people around you in a fun way about...

According to the results of a new study, children lacking Vitamin D may be more susceptible to food allergies. Researchers working at the Albert...

If you or your child has a peanut or nut allergy, identifying the presence of nuts in food becomes a priority, but what if the written or spoken...

Soap allergies can cause a lot of discomfort and itching. If you suddenly develop a rash or bumps on your skin, you may suspect that you have an...