More Articles
Peanut Allergy
You already know that if you or your child has a peanut allergy you need to avoid peanut butter. Some...
Food Allergies
There are many reasons why you may want to substitute almond flour for wheat flour in recipes. Of course, if you have a...
Food
Are you looking for peanut-free candies as a special treat for a child with...
Food
Do you have a child with peanut allergies and an upcoming birthday? Perhaps you'd like to bake a...
Food
Most nut butters provide all the same benefits: an easy sandwich spread, a great dip for veggies, a fun addition to a smoothie. But not...
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b] This is how I feel about IDEA/OHI for *my* cub.
[/b]
I understand, and I commend you. Truly.
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b]Gail. I've had an epiphany.
Hypothetically:
Hard data:
The criteria that if a child cannot attend school in safety, then a child cannot attend. Attendance is prohibited. And this affects learning by default. It is a ramification.[/b]
I understand this too. You provided this epiphany for me a long time ago in your thinking post in your IEP vs. 504 thread. I get the theory that attendance is prohibited if the school environment isn't safe for your child to attend. And therefore learning is absolutely affected because your child can't safely attend school.
I get/got that. The difficulty that I see with that line of thinking, which I basically agree with, is finding the supporting "data".
You and I took different paths in our processes. You are/were willing to remove your child from the school setting. I wasn't. Mariah's attendance records don't support an IDEA designation. Her "academic performance" doesn't support an IDEA designation.
So................
[b]What "criteria" or hard data would you use, MommaBear, that would support a OHI designation for a PA child who is doing well academically in school?[/b]
Quote:Originally posted by synthia:
[b]No money in the 504 treasure chest?[/b]
[i]there's a 504 treasure chest to begin with?[/i]
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b] [i]there's a 504 treasure chest to begin with?[/i]
[/b]
[img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img] lol
Apparently so,If not *what entity is paying for aides*? With *only* a 504 DYUWIM
------------------
Love this site
Synthia
So if they insist on an IHP, then I should insist that it is integrated into the 504 plan as an accommodation.
That makes sense...that would then hold the same legal weight for compliance. Got it.
*I still think the original wording is incorrect*
"Many districts consider the IHP *TO BE* a 504 Plan in the cases where a student needs only the health-related accommodations outlined in the IHP to access education."
Caps added (still haven't figured out to bold something)
Donna
Quote:Originally posted by notnutty:
[b]*I still think the original wording is incorrect*[/b]
Me too.
Quote:Originally posted by notnutty:
[b]Caps added (still haven't figured out to bold something)
[/b]
To bold something, put brackets around an upper case or lower case B in front of the beginning of what you want bolded. Like this, but without a space: [ b]
Then put a b in brackets with a backslash preceding it at the end of what you want bolded, like this but without a space: [ /b]
So if I am writing a sentence and want this portion to be bolded, I would write it like this:
So if I am writing a sentence and want [ b]this portion to be bolded, [ /b] I would.... but without the space in the brackets. (I needed to put the space in there or it would not show up in the post.)
Does that make sense?
[This message has been edited by Gail W (edited February 02, 2006).]
Pages