29 posts / 0 new
Last post
Posted on: Sat, 02/08/2003 - 10:38am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Cam's Mom, I'm pleased to hear that your meeting with the school went well (or fairly well). [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
I don't understand what the issue about the water bottle is either. The water bottle is something that I learned from here, from rilira's 504 Plan that is posted on the board. Jesse attended school safely for JK and SK without his Mother (me [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/rolleyes.gif[/img] ) even having thought about that.
It was in reading rilira's 504 Plan that I thought, OMG, I didn't even think about the drinking fountain. That's why it's now included in his written school plan and it makes total sense. But again, the things that you can possibly not think about until you've looked at someone else's plan.
(Total aside - I remember my Mother telling me not to drink from water fountains at the school because someone could come up from behind me and smash my mouth into the drinking fountain and I would lose my teeth - was that enough to scare the bejesus out of me so that I never used a water fountain at school? Yes! Unless I looked around and saw that the hall was totally empty. Can you imagine a Mom telling her kid that? I don't think she realized the serious psychological repercussions it would have on me! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/rolleyes.gif[/img] )
Does this mean that you will now go ahead to have a 504 Plan put into effect?
Things are so much different and from what you wrote, so much more difficult than it is here, in Canada. I have never had to provide a doctor's letter to Jesse's school giving them test scores on the *severity* of his PA.
The only thing that I had to have the doctor sign off on was the emergency medical plan which I wrote out and had the doctor sign. He just read the thing. I didn't have to prove to the school that Jesse was PA and that his reactions were anaphylactic. Of course, if I had had to do it, I would have, but it's just interesting that I didn't have to. It seems as though you have a lot of hoops to jump through to simply get your child into the school system. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/frown.gif[/img]
As far as the other PA child and the instructions that the school has been given regarding her care - well, this is where I find things can get kinda weird. I know that when I was in Stayner, Jesse was the only PA child in the school at the time, when he entered, and I kinda wished there was another PA child in the school and another PA parent to talk to. By the time we left Stayner, I think the number was up to 4 or 5 PA children in the school. I had paved the way and the school was "reduce the risk" just as we were leaving that town.
Jesse does have another PA child in his school, in Grade 1. When Jesse had his anaphylactic reaction at school in December month, I went over in the afternoon to review his emergency medical plan because basically I knew they had screwed up big-time (although I never followed-up on this with anyone). I happened to see the emergency medical plan for the other PA student (I am great at reading upside down, a great thing that one of my boss' taught me along the line) and no wonder I look like Psycho Mom from He**. She is also allergic to bee stings.
I do know that I posted about it here and what the exact wording was, probably in Jesse's reaction thread. I don't really want to mis-quote, but for a bee sting it was something like, give her Benadryl, call Mom.
If she INGESTS peanuts, administer Epi-pen, call Mom.
So, you can see where, if Jesse could have an anaphylactic reaction to residue (which I believe he did) and the school doesn't really understand because for the other PA child they only have to take it seriously and administer an Epi-pen should she INGEST peanuts. Just great.
Of course, I recognize that it's another PA parent's comfort zone, just as the Mom with the TNA child has a totally different one than I do. He is in Jesse's class. And again, I would look like Psycho Mom from He** with the requirements that I do have for the school.
Cam's Mom, to tell you the honest truth, I would LOVE it if Jesse was in a peanut free school. I would love a peanut safe school. I would love a reduce the risk school. I have to admit that it is the ONLY thing I miss about living in the other town. I had worked so hard and banged my head against the wall so often with the principal there and we finally seemed to click and get it together enough that we had a "reduce the risk" (what a great catch-all phrase that is) school and I moved. But, as I said, I did help other parents with PA children there.
On the flip-side, if Jesse is able to navigate through his school years (and only up until Grade 8 anyway) with a peanut free classroom only, perhaps that does show us parents more that our children can move around in this world safely. That is, if they don't suffer a reaction along the way.
Now, as I posted, I do believe Jesse suffered an anaphylactic reaction at school in December month from residue. I don't think that he has a newly developed sesame seed allergy. That's why I'm not rushing to get the allergist referral.
So, where do you tighten things up? The principal of his school had asked me to look over another school's policy re peanut allergic children in the school, but I'm not clear now whether this was before or after I was accused of harrassing Jesse's teacher.
I also think that because the principal is new at the school, she's trying a whole lotta new things (like the breakfast program I'm running) and some things aren't going to fly in the community whether she wants them to or not. So, I can certainly go over the policy, which I believe is for a "peanut safe" school (I really want to post it here - it is quite lengthy, but good), but why bother if she's really not going to do anything with it anyway? Do you know what I mean?
You obviously made the correct choice is going in asking for less. If the RN got wigged out about your son having his own drinking bottle (and I still can't wrap my mind around that one [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/confused.gif[/img] ), then can you imagine how she would have reacted had you asked for (and our asking always *seems* like demanding) a peanut free school.
I realize now that I had posted earlier to-day in your other thread when you really didn't need any further posts in it. Perhaps the links re peanut free schools, etc. can be useful for other members of PA.com. That's the great thing about posting information here (and I hope you post your plan for Cam as well [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img] ). We all help one another out.
The thing I couldn't understand about your other thread is, you were asking about peanut free schools. If another PA.com member doesn't agree with peanut free schools or peanut free classrooms, for that matter, can they just kinda avoid the thread and go on?
I know there was one running under Schools a few months ago where my two cents worth would not have mattered because it was about children not in a peanut free setting and asking how it was working out. Well, I can't answer that question because I'm not in that position. So, why bother entering the thread? Do you know what I mean?
It's like anything else on this board. If someone posts about something that I know nothing about or can contribute no support, caring, encouragement or information to the thread, what is the point of me posting a reply at all. I compare it to watching TV.
I don't know.
Please keep us posted on how this continues to go. It just sounds really positive right now and I am really pleased for you. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
Best wishes! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
------------------

Posted on: Sat, 02/08/2003 - 11:58am
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

Cindy,
The thread you re-raised for me was indeed a very comprehensive plan, and a wonderful one to say the least! Oh if I could only get a portion of that plan, what confindence I'd have. They seem to really care about there students.
I don't understand the water issue either, was reaching for whatever she could in my opinion. I also forgot too mention that when reading the part about the art crafts, and that I need to inspect each of them to make sure they are free of pnut protiens/oils, and that they need to replace old with new ones at the beg. of the year in case they are contaminated...She had the nerve to ask me if I check all of his art supplies at home...That infuriated me, big time! I said I most certainly do, along with shampoo, lotions, shaving cream, you name it it's checked...I wouldn't be asking you to do things I don't do for my own son. That and the water bottle comment really sent me over the top.
Monday I will be faxing my letter formally requesting that Cameron be covered under the 504 to the Superintendent of the school. The lady at the state level advised me to this ASAP, and that way this issue CAN'T be put on the back burner, which she said could always happen with FCAT Tests and spring break coming up.
The thing about the Dr's approval of the request I made were perplexing to me also. I even brought the letter the allergist which diagnosed Cam and did the testing on. This letter was addressed to his pedi. and stated what his scores were and that he had an anaphylatic reaction. They didn't even attempt to read it. So they are just, IMO, stalling so that they can talk w/district level administration and probably their attorney. I say this, b/c they knew I had obviously researched my legal part of this. I may have intimidated them, but oh well, I went in there prepared, and they weren't expecting what I was asking for. The word "homebound" was used a couple of times, and if he is definately inhalation reactive, then they said he definately needs to be homebound.
Friday I faxed his pedi. my letter, which was very detailed to what I needed and the request I've made to the school. Which was outline of RhondaS letter (which was great Rhonda, you are wonderful!! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img] ) I included the Proposed Emergency Plan with it and asked him to review and approve it. I am not signing a release for them to speak w/Cam's Dr's b/c the way the RN is being, she may take what she wants from his dr and leave out what she wants, whatever benefits the school.
I completely understand your view on not posting in threads. And not only that, the topic wasn't even requesting whether I should or should not ask for a ban. Oh well, go figure!
Thanks Cindy for the info, I'll keep you posted.
Lana [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
[This message has been edited by Cam's Mom (edited February 08, 2003).]

Posted on: Sat, 02/08/2003 - 3:15pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Cam's Mom, it's really late and I may have mis-read something that you posted above. Are you saying that if your son is inhalation reactive that even if covered by a 504 Plan he would not have the *right* to attend the school?
I don't understand. My best friend's son is airborne reactive, covered under a 504 Plan, and now, finally, after having to leave school last year for a few months, successfully in school in Michigan.
What about all of the other members here, in America, who have children that are airborne reactive?
I'm really confused [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/confused.gif[/img] Sorry. I know you don't really need my confusion, but this does baffle me.
From what I understand from the policies we have here in Ontario, anaphylaxis is anaphylaxis and it doesn't matter if it is caused by ingestion, contact, or inhalation.
My child still has the *right* to attend school in this province and he still has the *right* to a "peanut free" classroom.
I have never heard that someone could be denied entry into a school, with a 504 Plan in place, because they were inhalation sensitive. Would they be saying the same thing to you if you son was contact sensitive and not inhalation sensitive?
Very strange and also very sad. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/frown.gif[/img]
I think the other thing that bugs me about this is that we never know when our child may or may not become contact sensitive or inhalation sensitive.
With Jesse's last reaction, I am fairly clear that it was contact. Yet, he has managed to navigate through school for three years without having a contact reaction (especially an anaphylactic one). So, does that mean that he only recently developed a propensity towards contact reactions? And, if so, who is to say that he may not develop inhalation reactions next?
My point being (if I could ever just spit it out [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/rolleyes.gif[/img] ) - if you son was PA, without inhalation or contact reactions, the school may be more willing to accept him. He's firmly ensconced in school for a couple of years and then becomes inhalation sensitive.
Do they then boot him out?
No, pure craziness.
(Unless, in fact, I did mis-read, and it's me that's crazy instead [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/eek.gif[/img] )
As far as I understand things, with the Americans with Disabilities Act and a 504 Plan your son has the *right* to an education in America. Enough of this telling you that he has to be "homebound".
Please keep us posted. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
Best wishes! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
------------------

Posted on: Sat, 02/08/2003 - 11:07pm
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Cindy,
You posted:
"If another PA.com member doesn't agree with peanut free schools or peanut free classrooms, for that matter, can they just kinda avoid the thread and go on?"
Don't know whether you are addressing me in this sentence, but since I recently have posed questions about the subject, here goes:
Actually, it's irrelevant whether I agree with "peanut free" or not. It is not my point. Have I expressed that verbatim? I am obsessive by nature and having been immersed in an industry in which litigation is frequent (and possibly to some extent causes the re-evaluation of standards of care)I sometimes find myself disecting situations in everyday life attempting to see (for myself) what is reasonable, necessary, and actually able to be accomplished, just for my own peace of mind. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
Disclaimer: These are question posed for contemplation only. Discussion, Input.
By using the term "Peanut Free" with regards to an entire school are we legally binding the school to those exact words? why or why not? Is it something (if used verbatim) that is actually able to be accomplished? Guaranteed? Considering that most schools do not currently supply ALL foodstuffs comming in school buildings, let alone produce them, is it prudent for them to attach such a label to the school as a whole? Is there a better term to use? Legally speaking, that is. How does the concept of respondent superior apply to the school and those who enter it? Again, I am not an attorney, I am not schooled in law in anyway, these are just questions I have asked myself. I am not offering legal advice, I am not suggesting either way is more correct or prudent. Just trying to understand for the future what I myself as a parent of a PA child can expect in the road ahead. I am pre-planning, so to speak. I have found most people appreciate and respect honesty and would hope those I encounter in life extend the same to me.

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 4:48am
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

MommaBear,
Cindy's comment, IMO, and the way I percieved it, was not saying she didn't agree to disagree. She simply meant that the way the thread went, which there was no reason for, was not what this board is about. The person who initiated the thread going bad, came in there with the intention of debating why a ban shouldn't be implemented, and who does and doesn't support bans. And the way it was presented was a "I know best" way. This board is about helping other people and the way most people go about it on this board, is to offer experiences, opinions, and support. We all know that we have different opinions on most subjects, but the way we go about helping one another is stating our opinions w/out reaming the other for their opinion. And the previous thread is exactly what happened to me, I was reamed by that member for wanting a ban, and basically told me that the 2 organizations mentioned by her, would not support my decision, therefore I was wrong in my belief or wants. Another member actually disagreed w/a ban and posted, but the way it was presented was not in "your wrong to want a ban" way, it was presented in an effort to help me see the other point, or another way of doing it.
This may not be the way Cindy meant her statement, I don't know, but this is the way I percieved it.
As for your questions;
I don't see how having a pf school/classroom would be legally binding, they aren't being sued when students bring drugs or weapons to school, and most are drug and weapon free.
Able to be accomplished, I don't see why not...Guaranteed, never. Drugs and weapons can't be guaranteed not to come into the schools, but if they didn't have the policy in place, imagine the drugs and weapons that would be present, it simply reduces the risks.
Them attaching the label "Peanut Free" and there being a better term...there is the same term for drug and weapon free. I just don't see the difference, peanuts can have the same effect on my son as drugs and weapons are going to.
There will never be a guarantee that peanut products will not entering the school, there is also no guarantee that my son won't have a reaction in a pf school/room, but his risks of having one is greatly reduced by this policy being enforced.
Lana [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 5:36am
cynde's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/10/2002 - 09:00

Lana, I loved the comments in your last post.
"Peanut free" sends a stronger message to parents, and gives the school more authority when dealing with blips. Our sons K class was called a "peanut safe" area. The principal asked parents to think about not sending in peanut products. How's that for wishy washy. So if a parent thought about it and decided to still do it, the school has no recourse.
"Peanut Free", the school tells parents they cannot send in peanut products. If they do the students eat sandwiches while supervised, and peanut snacks are simply sent home. Of course their are no guarantees, it's all about "REDUCING THE RISK"!
------------------
Cynde
[This message has been edited by cynde (edited February 09, 2003).]

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 7:04am
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Momma Bear, no, my comment wasn't directed at you personally and actually not at anyone in particular because I stopped reading the other thread after the first page, once it "went bad".
The thing with the other thread was Cam's Mom asked a very specific question. She asked how difficult it was to get a peanut free school.
She didn't ask if members here believed in peanut free schools or peanut free classrooms for their children. She asked a very specific question. How hard is it to implement a peanut free school?
So, for members to come in and not specifically answer her question but start bashing and carrying on, in my opinion, is simply uncalled for. Her question basically didn't get answered.
I value reading other people's opinions about how they deal with their PA children in the school system. I appreciate reading why some PA parents don't require a peanut free school or classroom. I'm not saying that dissenting opinions shouldn't be posted.
What I did simply mean was that if someone (not you) wasn't going to answer the question that was posed, but start a whole other debate, then why bother entering the thread?
There was one under Schools a couple of months ago about PA children successfully attending school in a peanut filled classroom. I didn't enter the thread. I don't agree, but I also get the feeling that if you are one of the PA parents that requires a "peanut free" classroom or school for your child, you are seen as a minority here on the board, and my soul, we better watch our mouths (or fingers typing). The most vocal people are people that are against peanut free schools and classrooms and I continually feel the need to explain my position when I shouldn't really have to.
If you agree with my position re a peanut free classroom or school and I'm having difficulties and start a thread, help me out.
Don't come in and tell me why what I asked was not realistic and not supported by FAAN.
Do you know what I mean?
Also, Cam's Mom, one thing I did want to mention. I still have to e-mail Chris about PA.com and what their stance on "peanut free" is. However, I would like to note that if you look at the website address for PA.com it is a company, not an organization such as FAAN. It's [url="http://www.foodallergy.org"]www.foodallergy.org[/url]
For some reason, I feel that that distinction needs to be made. An allergy organization that people look to and an actual company that people join in a discussion board on are two different things.
Best wishes! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
------------------

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 11:03am
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

Cindy,
Sorry I didn't get back to your post earlier, I had some things I had to do, and am just now able to back to it.
As far as him not being allowed to enter the school if he is airborne reactive, I don't think they were saying he COULDN'T enter, they just thought he really NEEDED to be homebound.
And I totally agree 100% about the fact of how the reaction occurs shouldn't be a factor as to what accomadations are made, but that is what they are wanting, confirmation of how "sensitive" he is from his Dr's before they even discuss a PF room. And that shouldn't matter, since he's had anaphylatic reactions in the past. Besides if they weren't stalling me, then IMO, they would have atleast looked at the letter I had with me from the diagnosising allergist. I think this is just putting me off, till they can talk to higher ups.
But to answer your question, I think it's more or less a preference that he not be in school, they'd rather the homebound option.
Also, thank you for the clarification on PA.com, it does make a huge difference when comparing organizations to actual companies.
Thanks Cynde for the reply, I believe the fact that reducing the risk is the only way to explain.
Lana [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 12:24pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Cam's Mom, do you know if you have to prove the severity of your child's PA for him to be able to attend school with a 504 Plan in place and with the Americans with Disabilities Act behind you?
Here's my reasoning. I have heard the phrase "but her PA is not as severe as your son's" before. I have posted about it here. What I have found, after hearing it for years, and posting about it here, was that PA parents really mean, when they're speaking to me, that their child has not had an anaphylactic reaction like Jesse has.
I am not clear if they realize that their child has the potential to have an anaphylactic reaction or if they will just always believe that their child's PA isn't "severe". That's not my business. The comment did used to bother me.
The thing is, from all I can understand from the information I have received on this board, is that we never know what the next reaction will be like. We never know when a child that has never had an anaphylactic reaction will have an anaphylactic reaction.
We do not know, if our child's PA has not resulted in a severe (i.e., anaphylactic) reaction when it will.
Given all of that, I am trying to make a point. There are many members of PA.com whose children have never had an anaphylactic reaction and yet who still require a peanut free classroom for their child. There are two main reasons for this, I think. First of all, if you have the same tight comfort zone as a PA parent whose child has had anaphylactic reactions, you are trying to lessen the chance of your child having one.
If your child does not have an anaphylactic reaction, then they can be considered in the 20% that may outgrow the allergy. Once you have that anaphylactic reaction, outgrowing the allergy has been blown out the window.
And of course, the other obvious reason would be that no one wants their child to suffer an anaphylactic reaction.
Perhaps I was fortunate [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/frown.gif[/img] in that by the time Jesse was starting school he had already suffered two (perhaps 3) anaphylactic reactions and almost died because of his allergy. I fit into the board policy re anaphylaxis without question. However, at no time did a principal ever ask me for documentation from a doctor showing them that Jesse had, in fact, suffered an anaphylactic reaction or was even allergic to peanuts. They have simply taken my word for it. As I said before, the only thing I needed the doctor for was his signature on the emergency medical plan which I filled out, he read, and had to sign.
Cam has had anaphylactic reactions. However, let's say he hadn't. Cam has PA. Cam has the potential (I really wish I could do bold lettering) to have an anaphylactic reaction.
He has that potential regardless of what his score may be in an allergy test.
I'm sorry, it just seems to me as though you have to jump through a helluva lot of hoops to get your child into school. It makes my threads re what's going on with Jesse's school this year seem extremely mild in comparison.
I marvel at each and every American member here who has to do this to get their child into school. Prove with documentation that their child is PA. Prove how severe the PA is. And then, if it's really severe, be told that it would really be in the child's best interest for the child to be homebound rather than attend school.
I admire you. I think I'm banging my head against a brick wall, but, my soul, it is absolutely NOTHING in comparison. And, I think I'd also be packing my bags and moving to Canada, to a province that at least ensures you child the *right* to a peanut free classroom, kinda no questions asked.
Best wishes! [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
------------------

Posted on: Sun, 02/09/2003 - 1:27pm
anonymous's picture
Offline
Joined: 05/28/2009 - 16:42

Cindy,
I'm not sure if it is a requirement that he have a Dr's letter to be eligible for the 504, but I think it is. Now, as far as the inhalation reaction and him not being allowed in school. I dont think they can refuse his entry into school for any reason.
The reason the Asst. Principal stated the homebound option due to inhalation is (which I don't agree with, it made me real defensive), but her reasoning as she stated it was she said she just keeps picturing these little guys running around after lunch w/gobs of pb and jelly that has dripped on their shirt, this concerned them for the contact and inhalation reactions. And if Cameron is sitting next to them with this on their shirts, then he can inhale it.
I am probably confusing you more! It's hard to explain the whole conversation in writing. I know they were completely taken back after they looked at my plan, actually even before then, when we were discussing his history of reactions and causes. I think the thing that keeps going through their minds, unfortunately is the other pa child not needing anything. That, and the fact that the RN (who is in the medical field), was so outspokenly against the requests.
I agree that anyone with a peanut allergy is indeed a risk for anaphylatic reacations, regardless of their past history. Cameron's has become worse with less exposure, and I tried to relay that to them by comparing my non-pa son's sensitivity increase to bee stings. But I don't think they comprehend what I'm saying.
I hope I haven't confused you more. And also, what American's face trying to have a safe learning enviroment for their children is extremely exhausting, and I've already told DH if we move anywhere else, it's gonna be Canada. But I feel for you and Jesse and what you are encountering with his teacher, it is appalling to me that people with that kind of demeanor are in the profession of teaching our children, down right frightening!
Again, hope you are a little less confused, and hope I answered your questions.
Lana [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]

Pages

Peanut Free and Nut Free Community

Click on one of the categories below to see all topics and discussions.

Latest Discussions

Latest Post by Theschaeffers Mon, 07/13/2020 - 10:53am
Comments: 0
Latest Post by beachgal2020 Thu, 07/09/2020 - 2:17pm
Comments: 173
Latest Post by beachgal2020 Thu, 07/09/2020 - 2:08pm
Comments: 714
Latest Post by beachgal2020 Thu, 07/09/2020 - 1:51pm
Comments: 483
Latest Post by doggydude (not verified) Wed, 07/08/2020 - 6:06am
Comments: 9
Latest Post by doggydude (not verified) Wed, 07/08/2020 - 6:00am
Comments: 14
Latest Post by SmilinMo Tue, 06/09/2020 - 11:29am
Comments: 7
Latest Post by MoRich Mon, 06/01/2020 - 10:06am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by Sarah McKenzie Fri, 05/22/2020 - 12:57pm
Comments: 6

Peanut Free Store

More Articles

Peanuts and Nuts Can Trigger An Asthma Attack

According to the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAI), more than 3...

There are more "peanut-free" products than ever on the supermarket shelves. This means more choices than ever for peanut-allergic shoppers and...

It Is Easy To Buy Peanut Free Chocolate Online

Ask any parent of a child with a potentially life-...

How Do You Determine If A Food Is Safe For A Peanut Allergic Person?

The answer varies. “Peanut-free” means different things to different...

Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a New Drug Application for an epinephrine auto-injector (EAI) designed for use with...

Fact 1: Over a third of food allergy reactions happen after the first known oral...

It can be easy to overlook the presence of nut allergens in non-food items because the allergens are often listed by their Latin or scientific...

It’s hard to think of Chinese food without thinking of peanuts. China is the world’s leading peanut producer, and that’s not a coincidence....

Soymilk is one of the most popular alternatives to cow’s milk. As well as being rich in fiber, soy is a great source of protein and contains all...

My mom was at a lakeside restaurant enjoying fish and chips when her mouth began tingling. The next day at a family gathering, we had grilled...

Peanuts and peanut oil are cheap and easy additives to food and other commercial goods. It is surprising (and alarming if you have a...

Vegetable oil is healthy before it is hydrogenated and a process that requires adding hydrogen to unsaturated fats. Oils that are often...

Although it's true that peanuts are in many snack items, there are several snacks that do not contain peanuts. Anyone who has a peanut...

The most frightening thing about a severe allergic reaction to a new food is that it can happen so fast. If parents are not looking for allergic...

It may never be safe to begin feeding peanut butter to your baby or toddler if you have peanut allergies in your family. If either parent or one...

Families who have food allergies are familiar with reading food labels and of being aware of everything that they or their allergic child eats....

If a parent is alert and observing their toddler when peanuts are first introduced, the chance of the child receiving help if she has a reaction...

For those who don't have experience with peanut allergies, going 'peanut-free' often seems as easy as avoiding peanut butter sandwiches and bags...

Dealing with food allergies can be difficult, especially if you're not sure what's 'safe' to buy. This is especially true for those with severe...

Are you craving sweets? Those with peanut allergies must be especially careful when indulging their...