448 posts / 0 new
Last post
Posted on: Sun, 07/20/2003 - 7:56pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Apparently this thread has somehow missed my detection lately. Go figure [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/tongue.gif[/img]
Gail, actually, no I haven't been thinking about my past offer. As you may (or may not) know, my son who's in school does not have any food allergies (just bugs). I was offering to try to set something up if the pa parents wanted it, but, at the time none seemed interested.
****************
Raised to further some discussion with Cindy. I hope you understand, I'm moving here to avoid upsetting people by go off topic. Not sure it's actually going to be a debate though, more that I'm looking for clarification.
Alt to M said in another thread:
[b]Anna Marie, in referencing the TDSB policy, no PA students do not have the *right* to a "peanut free" school. However, they do have a *right* to a "peanut free" classroom.
The same as with your previous posts:-
A "milk free" classroom
A "chicken free" classroom
A "red dye free" classroom
Throughout the province of Ontario, whether a school goes "peanut free" (that would also include "peanut safe", "reduce the risk") is entirely up to the principal of the school (and I'm sure that principal in consultation with the school board and the superintendent in charge of health *issues*).
I truly believe that "peanut free" classrooms and schools are more common because it has only been documented that PA children have DIED in school.So, I think that's why "peanut free" is more common and more heard about than say "milk free".
[/b]
Question #1: Where does it say in Ontario that students have a right to an allergen free classroom? (I'm assuming not TDSB document because you are talking about the whole province.)
Question #2: Where does this info come from [b] Also, the thing with peanut residue and it's lifespan (i.e., six months on a surface that HAS been cleaned). [/b]
*************
I am asking these questions because I truly want to know. Seems silly to have to say this, but there are no ulterior motives.

Posted on: Sun, 07/20/2003 - 11:15pm
tando's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/13/2003 - 09:00

MB
Thanks for raising.
On your point of the drowning child in the river, I think you've missed a key link in the logic of your legality question. Responsibility. Is the the "adult" who fails to save the child the lifeguard? Is the child otherwise in the adult's charge? Is this a mere bystander?
What are the conditions of the river? Is it storm swollen? Is there a fast current or undertow? Or is this a designated swimming area?
All of these circumstances would impact the question. Also, I think more physical skill and risk are involved in leaping into a river to save a child than injecting an epipen or changing a menu and food preparation SOPs.
Having said that, I wasn't arguing for mandates or legislation in the other thread. I was simply stating that in the "higher" (morally, ethically, socially, coompassionate, whatever higher would mean) society, people would be internally driven to accommodate others needs.
To answer your question, will I go out on a limb and say this society doesn't exist now? As a whole, no, this isn't the society I live in -- but there are many individuals in our society that are this way, at least some of the time.
T.

Posted on: Sun, 07/20/2003 - 11:31pm
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Tando,
Thank you for replying. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/smile.gif[/img]
I guess (with regards to "responsibility") it may depend on what you are employed to do.
Chances are, you might be surprised to learn what people can are entitled to refuse. Based on Moral/Ethical principles even. Many times, this is [i]for the protection[/i] of the protectee.
Would you say that such refusal can be instrumental in developing PPP and SoP?
[i]free association at work here:[/i] Would you say "designated swimming areas" with lifeguard(s)have a higher level of "responsibility" (moral/ethical issues aside) than those that don't?
MommaBear [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/biggrin.gif[/img]
? "responsibility" = "duty" ?

Posted on: Sun, 07/20/2003 - 11:56pm
Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Hope this isn't a private discussion.
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b]I guess (with regards to "responsibility") it may depend on what you are employed to do.
Chances are, you might be surprised to learn what people can are entitled to refuse. Based on Moral/Ethical principles even. Many times, this is [i]for the protection[/i] of the protectee.[/b]
[i]Sounds familiar![/i] Actually, I wouldn't be surprised. Discussions with my son regarding responsibilities due to his training. [i]This comment actually is on topic[/i]. Previously there was a thread regarding whether or not ambulances or fire trucks had epi-pens. In my city ambulances - yes; fire trucks -no. Why? Because all though fire trucks may be the first to answer a 911 call [b]they are not trained to diagnose anaphylactic reactions[/b] so they cannot give epinephrine. Therefore, for the protection of the protectee, they can refuse to administer an epi-pen.
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b]Would you say that such refusal can be instrumental in developing PPP and SoP?[/b]
Yes. IMPO
Quote:Originally posted by MommaBear:
[b][i]free association at work here:[/i] Would you say "designated swimming areas" with lifeguard(s)have a higher level of "responsibility" (moral/ethical issues aside) than those that don't?
[/b]
Yes. IMPO

Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2003 - 12:17am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

Quote:Originally posted by AnnaMarie:
[b]Hope this isn't a private discussion.
[/b]
[i]Not at all.[/i] [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/biggrin.gif[/img]
As long as you are prepared to buy a round. [img]http://uumor.pair.com/nutalle2/peanutallergy/cool.gif[/img]

Posted on: Mon, 07/21/2003 - 12:25am
tando's picture
Offline
Joined: 06/13/2003 - 09:00

MB,
Yes, people have the right to refuse. And the injured party may refuse help (there's been some discussion of this in other threads, too).
The original thread was about the moral, ethical, social issues and the direction society may or may not evolve -- I find myself now off track. I'm going to stop here and retrace my steps.
I'll continue discussing the original thread if there's interest. ("Morals" thread)
T.

Posted on: Sat, 12/06/2003 - 1:45am
MommaBear's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/23/2002 - 09:00

reraising to compliment a thread in Media.

Pages

Peanut Free and Nut Free Community

Click on one of the categories below to see all topics and discussions.

Latest Discussions

Latest Post by agrohimacn Tue, 02/25/2020 - 1:25pm
Comments: 0
Latest Post by krisztina Thu, 02/20/2020 - 4:49pm
Comments: 1
Latest Post by chicken Thu, 02/20/2020 - 4:45pm
Comments: 3
Latest Post by lexy Tue, 01/28/2020 - 12:21am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by JRM20 Sun, 01/26/2020 - 11:15am
Comments: 6
Latest Post by JRM20 Sun, 01/26/2020 - 11:11am
Comments: 5
Latest Post by Italia38 Wed, 01/15/2020 - 11:03am
Comments: 10
Latest Post by Italia38 Wed, 01/15/2020 - 10:52am
Comments: 2

Peanut Free Store

More Articles

If children begin to eat many different foods at a young age, there is much more of a chance that by the time they are in school, they will eat...

Those with peanut allergies often find that they are unable to enjoy dessert since there's always the...

If you've ever tried to find...

For those with peanut allergies, baked goods present a serious risk. Many baked goods do not appear to contain peanuts, yet were baked in a...

Those who have peanut allergies know to avoid peanut butter cookies, of course – but what about other...

Which candy bars are safe for those with peanut allergies? Those without allergies are accustomed to...

Are you looking for peanut-free candies as a special treat for a child with...

For those who have wondered whether airport x-ray machines negatively affect epinephrine auto-injectors, the folks at Food Allergy Research &...

Molecular allergy component testing identifies the specific food or environmental proteins triggering a person’s allergic reactions. Component...

An epinephrine auto-injector provides an emergency dose of epinephrine (adrenaline) to treat life-threatening allergic reactions. Those who have...

Misunderstanding the significance of food allergy test results can lead to unnecessary anxiety and dietary changes. The three tests used most...

It can be easy to overlook the presence of nut allergens in non-food items because the allergens are often listed by their Latin or scientific...

Tree nuts and peanuts are distinctly different. An allergy to one does not guarantee an allergy to the other. Peanuts are considered legumes and...

Welcome to the complex world of being a Peanut Allergy Parent. Get ready to proofread food labels, get creative with meals, and constantly hold an...

Take control of your food allergies! Get results in ten days and change your life forever! If you are tempted to use a home testing kit...

What can you eat if you can't eat peanut butter? Fortunately for people with a peanut allergy, there...

According to the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, one out of five people in the U.S. has an allergy. Because there is a...

Eliminating peanut butter is the best way to handle a rash caused by this food

If your baby or toddler develops a rash caused by peanut...

Nearly all infants are fussy at times. But how do you know when your baby's crying means something wrong? Some babies are excessively fussy...

For those who don't have experience with peanut allergies, going 'peanut-free' often seems as easy as avoiding peanut butter sandwiches and bags...